-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 788
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(compiler) restore old copy behaviour, with new ignore option #6020
fix(compiler) restore old copy behaviour, with new ignore option #6020
Conversation
we encounter copy problems with |
Hey, is there any update or traction on this? This is currently acting as a blocker from us updating. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Sorry for this regression. We were not completely aware of all use cases. This will help us fix the current issues and eventually attempt to get this right a second time.
@George-Payne it seems like the copy task test I added is failing, mind checking? |
5c3b35f
to
d21408f
Compare
@christian-bromann Didn't realise there were multiple test commands, so missed that one. I moved it to use a glob and amended the commit. |
Hey, is there anything blocking this from being added? We're very excited about this fix to make it in 😃 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
@George-Payne thanks for the contribution, we will release this next week on Monday. |
What is the current behavior?
#5899 introduced a lot of regressions:
A breaking change in copy behavior: #5983
file to file copying broken: #5956
EBUSY: resource busy: #5966
Directories from above the root dir are copied outside of the output dir.
What is the new behavior?
This PR restores the old copy behavior, but uses the passed filter list, rather than the hardcoded one.
This isn't an optimum fix, as it changes the copy back to
dir
todir
(orfile
tofile
), so ignore patterns aren't matched against child files. Only glob matches are ignored (as was the previous behavior). IMO it's better than the large number of regressions, especially as this can now be worked around (e.g. in the case of #5781) by the user moving to a glob copy, with the new ignore option.Documentation
none
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Testing
Tested on own repo.
Other information
fixes: #5983
fixes: #5956
fixes: #5966